Menu
  • Publish Your Research/Review Articles in our High Quality Journal for just USD $99*+Taxes( *T&C Apply)

    Offer Ends On

Review Article

Vigilance for Food Insecurity

Aditi Munmun Sengupta*, Vivienne Bond-Grothus, Michelle Wood, Johncy SMI, Judy Reego and Jacqueline Riviero

Corresponding Author: Aditi Munmun Sengupta, Member of Indian Science Congress, Member of Academy of Family Physicians of India (West Bengal Chapter), Harvard Medical School, Post Graduate Association member (United States), P225/1 CIT Road, Schem

Received: April 11, 2025 ;    Revised: April 22, 2025 ;    Accepted: April 25, 2025 ;   Available Online: May 06, 2025

Citation: Sengupta AM, Bond-Grothus V, Wood M, Johncy SMI, Reego J, et al. (2025) Vigilance for Food Insecurity. J Pharm Sci Drug Discov, 4(1): 1-11.

Copyrights: ©2025 Sengupta AM, Bond-Grothus V, Wood M, Johncy SMI, Reego J, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Share Your Publication :

Views & Citations

63

Likes & Shares

0


Global Views

  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Images
  • Tables
  • References
  • PDF
  • Supplementary Files

Monitoring food insecurity involves systematically tracking and assessing the availability, accessibility, and utilization of food resources within a population. This process includes gathering data on various factors such as economic conditions, social determinants, and environmental influences that contribute to food scarcity. By employing surveys, interviews, and statistical analysis, organizations and researchers can identify vulnerable groups, understand the severity of food insecurity, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. Continuous monitoring (Figure 1) allows for timely responses to emerging issues, ensuring that policies and programs are adapted to meet the changing needs of communities. Ultimately, effective monitoring is crucial for developing strategies to alleviate food insecurity and promote food security for all.

INTRODUCTION

Definition

Vigilance is the practice of maintaining careful observation to identify and prevent potential threats or challenges. It entails closely monitoring the actions of personnel and taking prompt actions to promote ethical behavior while ensuring integrity and honesty in official interactions [1].

Objective

Some individuals may engage in unethical behavior for personal benefit, often at the organization's expense. Such actions can lead to waste, financial losses, and economic decline, while also negatively impacting others and damaging the organization's reputation and goodwill. Consequently, vigilance is essential to mitigate these harmful behaviors and protect the organization's interests [2].

  • Vigilance awareness aids in:
  • Deterring misconduct
  • Protecting honest employees
  • Promoting transparency and fairness
  • Ensuring accountability
  • Reducing waste and leakages
  • Cultivating a culture of honesty and integrity
  • Reforming systems and streamlining procedures to facilitate corruption-free Vigilance as a tool to combat potential harm.

Vigilance is vital in all areas of the organization, which is why it is important for every employee to adopt a vigilant mind-set. The organization's vigilance framework should identify areas prone to corruption and focus on establishing effective governance systems. Special attention should be given to units [3] where:

  • Officials have considerable discretion
  • There is a risk of circumventing established protocols
  • Rules and procedures are excessively complex
  • Accountability is insufficient
  • Delays in decision-making negatively impact client interests
  • Opportunities for negotiation exist [4]

Food scarcity refers to the insufficient availability of food resources to meet the dietary needs of a population. This phenomenon can arise from various factors, including environmental conditions such as droughts or floods, economic challenges that limit access to food, and social issues like conflict or displacement. The consequences of food scarcity are profound, leading to malnutrition, increased health risks, and heightened vulnerability among affected communities. Addressing food scarcity requires a multifaceted approach, including sustainable agricultural practices, improved food distribution systems, and policies aimed at enhancing food security for all individuals [5,6].

TAXONOMY OF FOOD INSECURITY

Food insecurity is an economic and social condition marked by a perceived inability to consistently access enough nutritious food essential for sustaining an active and healthy lifestyle. This issue can present itself in various ways, including chronic, temporary, or episodic instances, such as running out of financial resources at the end of the month, or as a consequence of specific events like job loss. Furthermore, the impact of food insecurity can vary among different members of a household; for instance, parents or caregivers may choose to skip their own meals to ensure that their children receive adequate nutrition. It is crucial to differentiate food insecurity from hunger, which is generally regarded as a physiological condition that individuals experience as a result of food insecurity [6-8].

In response to food insecurity, individuals may modify their food choices, seek alternative sources of food—such as grocery stores, convenience stores, or food pantries-adjust the amount of food they consume, or even skip meals entirely. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) provides definitions for both food insecurity and food security. Within the framework of food insecurity, "very low food security" refers to situations where some household members reduce their food intake due to financial limitations, while "low food security" indicates that households occasionally compromise the quality, variety, or appeal of their diets while still maintaining regular eating patterns. Food security itself is divided into two levels: "marginal food security," where households experience occasional challenges or anxiety regarding food access but do not significantly alter the quality, variety, or quantity of their food intake, and "high food security," where households do not encounter any issues or anxiety about consistently obtaining sufficient food [8,9].

MAGNITUDE OF FOOD INSECURITY

The Current Population Survey, carried out by the Economic Research Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), indicated that in the year 2022, a significant 12.8% of households encountered food insecurity. This statistic encompasses 7.7% of households that were identified as having low food security, alongside 5.1% classified as experiencing very low food security [8].

Alarmingly, nearly one-third of households with incomes falling below the federal poverty line are impacted by this pressing issue. Food insecurity is not merely a matter of access to food; it is intertwined with a multitude of medical, psychological, and social challenges that are particularly pronounced among families facing economic hardship. The repercussions of food insecurity extend beyond mere hunger, as both children and adults who endure this condition are associated with a range of adverse health outcomes, highlighting the critical need for comprehensive interventions to address this multifaceted problem [10].

Food insecurity is largely influenced by poverty, which can arise from unemployment and a variety of other circumstances. Research has shown that certain demographics are particularly susceptible to food insecurity. These include households with children, especially those with young children under the age of six, single-parent families, individuals whose incomes fall below 185% of the poverty line, older adults, people with disabilities, and veterans. Furthermore, the presence of a chronic medical condition not only heightens the likelihood of experiencing food insecurity but is also associated with it [11,12].

Residents living in low-income neighborhoods are at an increased risk of food insecurity due to multiple factors, including limited access to healthy food options, a lack of full-service grocery stores, and insufficient public and private transportation services [12].

There are significant racial and ethnic disparities in food insecurity rates. According to data from the USDA, in 2022, 20% of Hispanic households, 22% of non-Hispanic Black households, and 9% of White households faced food insecurity. Although recent data for Native American and Alaska Native populations is not available, estimates from the decade preceding a 2010 report suggested that their annual food insecurity rates ranged between 20% and 30% [13].

INTENSITY OF FOOD INSECURITY IN ASIA

The scale of food security in Asia is a complex and multifaceted issue that encompasses various dimensions, including availability, access, utilization, and stability of food supplies. Asia, being the most populous continent, faces significant challenges in ensuring food security for its diverse populations [14].

Firstly, the availability of food is influenced by agricultural productivity, climate change, and natural disasters. Many Asian countries rely heavily on agriculture, and fluctuations in weather patterns can severely impact crop yields. Additionally, urbanization and land degradation pose threats to agricultural land, further complicating food production [15].

Secondly, access to food is a critical aspect of food security. Economic disparities across the region mean that while some populations enjoy abundant food resources, others struggle with poverty and lack of access to nutritious food. Infrastructure, such as transportation and storage facilities, also plays a vital role in ensuring that food can reach those in need [16].

Utilization refers to the nutritional quality of food and the health of individuals. In many parts of Asia, malnutrition remains a pressing concern, particularly among vulnerable groups such as children and pregnant women. Ensuring that populations not only have access to food but also to nutritious food is essential for improving overall health outcomes [17].

Lastly, stability is crucial for food security, as it encompasses the resilience of food systems to shocks such as economic downturns, conflicts, and pandemics. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted vulnerabilities in food supply chains, emphasizing the need for robust systems that can withstand such disruptions [18,19].

In summary, the scale of food security in Asia is shaped by a variety of factors, including agricultural practices, economic conditions, nutritional standards, and the resilience of food systems. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated efforts from governments, international organizations, and local communities to ensure that all individuals have reliable access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food [20].

WHY VIGILANCE IS IMPORTANT FOR FOOD INSECURITY?

Oversight is vital in the context of food security, as it guarantees the establishment of systems and processes that facilitate reliable access to adequate, safe, and nutritious food for everyone. Effective oversight encompasses the monitoring and assessment of food production, distribution, and consumption practices to pinpoint potential risks and inefficiencies [21].

By instituting strong oversight mechanisms, governments and organizations can identify and rectify challenges such as food waste, disruptions in the supply chain, and unequal access to food resources. This proactive strategy not only helps preserve the integrity of food systems but also builds public confidence in food safety standards and regulations [16].

Furthermore, oversight is crucial for advancing sustainable agricultural practices that safeguard the environment while addressing the increasing demand for food. It promotes transparency and accountability among all stakeholders, including farmers, suppliers, and retailers, thereby fostering collaboration and innovation within the food industry [22].

The significance of oversight in securing food availability cannot be emphasized enough. It is an essential element that bolsters the resilience of food systems, safeguards public health, and enhances the overall well-being of communities [23] (Figure 2).

CATEGORIES OF VIGILANCE ESSENTIAL FOR TACKLING FOOD INSECURITY

Monitoring Food Supply Chains: It is crucial to maintain oversight of the entire food supply chain, from production to distribution. This includes tracking agricultural outputs, transportation logistics, and market availability to ensure that food reaches those in need efficiently [24].

Assessing Nutritional Quality: Vigilance must also focus on the nutritional value of available food. Ensuring that food options are not only abundant but also healthy is vital for combating malnutrition and promoting overall public health [25].

Evaluating Economic Accessibility: Continuous assessment of food prices and economic conditions is necessary to determine whether individuals and families can afford adequate nutrition. This involves monitoring income levels, employment rates, and inflation, which directly impact food purchasing power [26].

Identifying Vulnerable Populations: It is important to identify and monitor groups that are particularly susceptible to food insecurity, such as low-income families, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities. Tailored interventions can then be developed to support these populations effectively [27].

Engaging Community Resources: Vigilance should include fostering collaboration among local organizations, government agencies, and community groups. This collective effort can enhance food distribution networks and provide support services to those facing food insecurity [28].

Implementing Policy Advocacy: Continuous advocacy for policies that address the root causes of food insecurity is essential. This includes promoting sustainable agricultural practices, improving social safety nets, and ensuring equitable access to food resources [29].

Utilizing Data and Technology: Leveraging data analytics and technology can enhance the ability to predict food shortages and assess the effectiveness of interventions. This includes using geographic information systems (GIS) and other tools to analyze food access and distribution patterns [30].

By focusing on these categories of vigilance, stakeholders can develop comprehensive strategies to effectively address and mitigate food insecurity in communities [12].

ROLE OF VIGILANCE AS A PREVENTION AID TO FOOD INSECURITY

The opportunity to mitigate the negative consequences of food insecurity can be greatly improved through sustained and focused efforts. By adopting strategic initiatives and encouraging a proactive mind-set, both communities and individuals can take significant steps toward decreasing the incidence of food insecurity. This may encompass a range of actions, including enhancing access to healthy food options, optimizing food distribution networks, and implementing educational programs that equip individuals with the knowledge to make healthy dietary decisions. Additionally, fostering collaboration among government entities, non-profit organizations, and local communities can establish a strong support system dedicated to tackling the underlying issues contributing to food insecurity. With perseverance and dedication, it is indeed feasible to lessen the effects of food insecurity and foster a healthier, more sustainable future for everyone [31].

GREENING THE FUTURE CHALLENGES

The focus of global food policy trends is moving toward tackling sustainability, nutrition, and food security. The long-term sustainability of food systems in the face of climate change and other problems, lowering food waste, and making nutritious diets more affordable and accessible are important areas of study. In order to handle the intricate issues that food systems face, there is a tendency toward integrating food policies with other fields, including agriculture, health, and the environment. Policies that prioritize both short-term respite and long-term fixes are being created to fight hunger and enhance food access for disadvantaged groups. Food systems need to be changed to be more sustainable, considering social, economic, and environmental factors. This is becoming increasingly apparent smallholder farmers and underprivileged groups face major obstacles in many food systems, which are marked by injustices. It is necessary to implement policies that integrate across many sectors and governmental levels in order to address the complexity of food systems [32-34] (Figure3).

  1. Trends in Food Policy within the United States

Food Insecurity Overview as per US standards [37,38]

Access to food is a vital social determinant of health, necessary for a healthy lifestyle.

  • About 1 in 7 U.S. households (13.5%) faced food insecurity, affecting 47.4 million people.
  • Food insecurity is higher among Black and Hispanic households, with rates of 23.3% and 21.9%, respectively.
  • Both urban and rural residents are vulnerable, with food insecurity rates of 15.7% and 15.4%.
  • Women living alone have a food insecurity rate of 16.2%, while single-mother households report rates up to 34.7%.
  • One in five pregnant individuals faces food insecurity.

A notable trend that has emerged in state legislatures, spanning the entire political spectrum, is the enactment of food freedom laws. These laws provide exemptions for retailers from complying with established food safety regulations, thereby facilitating the sale of food products at various venues such as farmers' markets, farms, seaside docks, and even uninspected retail establishments. This situation raises significant concerns regarding the potential for serious foodborne illnesses, as public health officials at both state and local levels find themselves unable to regulate, inspect, or prohibit the sale of these unregulated products [39].

In parallel, it is estimated that approximately 35 percent of food produced in the United States is wasted, leading to an astonishing total of over 100 million tons of food waste each year across various sectors, including retail, food service, residential, and manufacturing. This troubling statistic starkly contrasts with the more than 80 million households projected to face food insecurity in the U.S. in 2023. Such developments pose a serious threat to the safety, health, and overall well-being of the American populace [38].

  1. Food policy in Europe

Recent trends in European food policy emphasize sustainability, resilience, and the need to tackle issues such as climate change and food security. A significant initiative in this regard is the European Green Deal's Farm to Fork Strategy, which seeks to establish a more sustainable and equitable food system [40].

Here is a closer examination of these trends:

  1. Sustainability and the Farm to Fork Strategy:

The Farm to Fork Strategy, a pivotal component of the European Green Deal, aims to shift towards a sustainable food system that prioritizes health, environmental stewardship, and fairness. It acknowledges the interconnections between the well-being of individuals, communities, and the planet. The strategy seeks to ensure that the entire food supply chain, from production to consumption, has a neutral or beneficial environmental impact, contributes to climate change mitigation, and promotes food security, nutrition, and public health. Additionally, it strives to maintain food affordability while ensuring fair economic returns throughout the supply chain [40,41].

  1. Addressing Climate Change and Environmental Impact:

The European Union is actively working to lower greenhouse gas emissions from the food sector by advocating for sustainable agricultural practices, minimizing food waste, and promoting plant-based diets. The zero-pollution action plan and the EU biodiversity strategy for 2030 are integral components of the policy framework established by the European Green Deal. The emphasis is on ensuring that the food supply chain has a neutral or positive environmental footprint, thereby aiding in climate change mitigation and adaptation [42].

  1. Food Security and Nutrition:

A primary focus of the EU is to guarantee food security, nutrition, and public health, ensuring that all individuals have access to adequate, nutritious, and sustainable food options. Efforts are underway to enhance food safety and quality while addressing challenges such as food waste and malnutrition. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) plays a crucial role by providing independent scientific guidance on food-related risks, which informs European legislation, regulations, and policy development [43].

  1. Resilience and Adaptation to Crises:

The European Union is actively enhancing its food supply chains to better prepare for and address potential crises. In this context, the European Food Security Crisis Preparedness and Response Mechanism (EFSCM) was established as part of the "Contingency Plan for Ensuring Food Supply and Food Security in Times of Crisis." Key trends emerging in this area include regenerative agriculture, alternatives to meat, targeted nutritional solutions, resilience in technology and food systems, and the reduction of food waste [44,45].

  • Policies regarding Food in the Asian subcontinent

Food policies across Asia are changing to tackle various issues such as food security, nutrition, and sustainable methods. Significant trends involve a movement towards healthier eating habits, greater attention to plant-based options, and the incorporation of technology within the food system. Moreover, there is an increasing focus on local sourcing, sustainable farming, and the reduction of food waste [46].

The trends include:

  1. Movement Towards Healthier Eating Habits:
  • Dietary Shift: Numerous Asian nations are witnessing a shift from traditional, grain-centric diets to more heavily processed foods, resulting in a rise in obesity and diet-related chronic diseases.
  • Focus on Plant-Centric Diets: The popularity of plant-centered diets and substitutes for animal products is increasing, as consumers seek healthier and more sustainable food choices.
  • Growing Intake of Animal Products: Although there is a movement towards plant-based diets, there is also an uptick in the consumption of animal products, such as meat, eggs, and dairy, which can affect sustainability and food security [47].
  1. Technology and Sustainability:
  • Integration of Technology: Asian food policies are adopting technology to enhance food traceability, boost production efficiency, and minimize food waste.
  • Sustainable Sourcing and Agriculture: There is an increasing focus on sustainable farming techniques, which include reducing the use of chemical inputs, encouraging crop diversity, and supporting local farmers.
  • Food Traceability and Transparency: Consumers are more frequently seeking assurances of safe and transparent food supply chains, prompting the creation of food traceability systems [48,49].
  1. Tackling Food Security and Affordability:
  • Emphasizing Food Self-Sufficiency: Certain Asian nations are focusing on food self-sufficiency to lessen dependence on imports and enhance food security.
  • Tackling Affordability Challenges: Many households in the region find nutrient-rich foods to be too expensive, highlighting the need for policies that ensure nutritious diets are affordable and accessible.
  • Minimizing Food Waste: Food waste is a major concern in Asia, leading to the implementation of policies aimed at decreasing waste throughout the food supply chain [48,50].
  1. Food policies in Subsaharan Africa

One distinctive feature of African food policy is that they are frequently based on political and economic agendas, favoring urban populations and winning over elites above farmers' demands. As a result, farming communities are impacted by policy outcomes that alter social and economic trends in rural areas [51].

  1. Using policy as a tool: In Africa, food policies are frequently employed as a tool to accomplish political and economic objectives that go beyond ensuring food security, such as upholding social order and winning over influential factions [52,53].
  2. Emphasis on Urban Needs: These policies usually give priority to the food requirements of urban dwellers, possibly ignoring the concerns and interests of rural farmers, who are the mainstay of food production [54,55].
  3. Rural Area Transformation: Rural communities may experience unforeseen repercussions from the implementation of non-farmer-centric food policies, which could change their social and economic structures in ways that are detrimental to the agriculture industry [56,57].
  4. Instances of Policy Impact: This could involve modifications to market accessibility, land ownership, and crop varieties, all of which can impact farming communities' means of subsistence [58,59].
  5. Emerging trends in food policy in India

India has consistently ranked low on the Global Hunger Index, highlighting a severe hunger crisis in the country. In the 2021 Global Hunger Index, India ranked 101st among 116 nations [60].

National Food Security Act (NFSA): The NFSA aims to provide subsidized food grains to a significant segment of the population through the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) [61].

Challenges: Despite some advancements, India continues to face obstacles in achieving food security, including poverty, inequality, and climate change impacts [62].

Food Safety Measures in India [63]:

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI):

The FSSAI serves as the regulatory authority for ensuring food safety and standards throughout India.

Key Functions of FSSAI:

  • Consolidates food legislation.
  • Monitors food manufacturing, processing, distribution, storage, and importation.
  • Establishes food item standards.
  • Regulates food additives, toxins, antibiotics, pesticides, and contaminants.
  • Issues licenses and registrations for food businesses.
  • Sets packaging and labeling requirements.
  • Promotes consumer awareness.

Government of India Initiatives [66]:

National Food Security Act (NFSA): Guarantees access to subsidized food grains.

Public Distribution System (PDS): Supports the distribution of food grains to eligible beneficiaries.

Mid-Day Meal Scheme: Provides nutritious meals to students in educational institutions.

Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS): Focuses on improving the health and nutrition of children, as well as pregnant and nursing women.

Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY): Offers crop insurance protection to farmers.

National Food Processing Mission: Promotes food processing and the development of value-added products.

  1. Enhancing the Food Safety network in accordance with WHO guidelines.

Access to safe, nutritious food is essential for life and health (Figure 4). Contaminated food, harboring harmful bacteria, viruses, parasites, or chemicals, can cause over 200 diseases, including diarrhea and cancer. Annually, approximately 600 million people-nearly 1 in 10-suffer from foodborne illnesses, resulting in 420,000 deaths and a loss of 33 million healthy life years or Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) [65].

The link between food safety, nutrition, and food security is significant. Unsafe food perpetuates a cycle of disease and malnutrition, particularly impacting vulnerable groups such as infants, young children, the elderly, and those with health conditions. A stable food supply enhances food security and bolsters national economies, trade, and tourism, promoting sustainable development. Factors like global food trade, population growth, climate change, and evolving food systems affect food safety. The World Health Organization (WHO) is committed to improving the ability to prevent, detect, and address public health threats related to food insecurity [66,67].


CONCLUSION

Monitoring food insecurity entails a comprehensive and systematic approach to tracking and evaluating the availability, accessibility, and utilization of food resources within a given population. This intricate process involves the collection of data on a variety of factors that influence food scarcity, including economic conditions, social determinants, and environmental factors. To achieve this, organizations and researchers utilize a range of methodologies such as surveys, interviews, and statistical analyses. These tools enable them to pinpoint vulnerable populations, assess the extent of food insecurity, and measure the effectiveness of existing interventions.

Furthermore, ongoing monitoring is essential as it facilitates prompt responses to emerging challenges related to food insecurity. This responsiveness ensures that policies and programs can be adjusted to address the evolving needs of communities effectively. Ultimately, the significance of effective monitoring cannot be overstated, as it is vital for formulating strategies aimed at alleviating food insecurity and fostering food security for all individuals.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

University of Calcutta, Harvard University, Mrs. V. Francoise and family. The MIT Solve Team, Ms. Sunita Clara, a good friend and a support for good hygiene practices.

Conflicts of Interest: There are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical declaration: This material is the authors’ own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere. All images are reproduced with permission.

 

  1. Ajslev JZN, Nimb Ika EE, Andersen MF (2024) In the name of safety-safety monitoring and the development of the Duty, Utility, Virtue framework for ethical consideration. Safe Sci 173: 106448.
  2. Basu K, Palazzo G (2008) Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Acad Manag Rev 33(1): 122-136.
  3. Graafland J, Van de Ven B (2006) Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility. J Corp Citiz 22: 111-123.
  4. McElhaney KA (2009) A strategic approach to corporate social responsibility. Leader Leader 52: 30-36.
  5. Morrissey TW, Cha Y, Wolf S, Khan M (2020) Household economic instability: Constructs, measurement, and implications. Child Youth Serv Rev 118: 105502.
  6. Crespo-Bellido M, Grutzmacher S, Smit E (2021) Food security and alternative food acquisition among US low-income households: Results from the National Food Acquisition and Purchasing Survey (FoodAPS). Public Health Nutr 24(5): 787-795.
  7. Seligman HK, Berkowitz SA (2019) Aligning Programs and Policies to Support Food Security and Public Health Goals in the United States. Ann Rev Public Health 40: 319-337.
  8. Reed-Jones M (2023) USDA Economic Research Service. Prevalence of U.S. household food insecurity increased in 2022.
  9. USDA Economic Research Service (2023) Food Security in the U.S.- Measurement.
  10. Wight V, Kaushal N, Waldfogel J, Garfinkel I (2014) Understanding the Link between Poverty and Food Insecurity among Children: Does the Definition of Poverty Matter? J Child Poverty 20(1): 1-20.
  11. Balistreri KS (2018) Family Structure and Child Food Insecurity: Evidence from the Current Population Survey. Soc Indic Res 138(3): 1171-1185.
  12. Odoms-Young A, Brown AGM, Agurs-Collins T, Glanz K (2024) Food Insecurity, Neighborhood Food Environment, and Health Disparities: State of the Science, Research Gaps and Opportunities. Am J Clin Nutr 119(3): 850-861.
  13. Varela EG, McVay MA, Shelnutt KP, Mobley AR (2023) The Determinants of Food Insecurity Among Hispanic/Latinx Households with Young Children: A Narrative Review. Adv Nutr 14(1): 190-210.
  14. ARISE (2021) Workshop of the Task Force-ASEAN Food Safety Regulatory Framework (AFSRF) Agreement. Accessed on: March 07, 2023. Available online at: https://ariseplus.asean.org/tf-afsrf/
  15. Bouteska A, Sharif T, Bhuiyan F, Abedin Md Z (2024) Impacts of the changing climate on agricultural productivity and food security: Evidence from Ethiopia. J Clean Prod 449: 141793.
  16. Durao S, Visser ME, Ramokolo V, Oliveira JM, Schmidt BM, et al. (2020) Community-level interventions for improving access to food in low-and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(8): CD011504.
  17. Torlesse H, Aguayo VM (2018) Aiming higher for maternal and child nutrition in South Asia. Matern Child Nutr 4(Suppl 4): e12739.
  18. Kumareswaran K, Jayasinghe GY (2022) Systematic review on ensuring the global food security and covid-19 pandemic resilient food systems: Towards accomplishing sustainable development goals targets. Discov Sustain 3(1): 29.
  19. Béné C (2020) Resilience of local food systems and links to food security-A review of some important concepts in the context of COVID-19 and other shocks. Food Secur 12(4): 805-822.
  20. Agarwala C, Jemaneh, J, Kassie Y (2022) Government Policies and Sustainable Food Systems: Navigating Challenges, Seizing Opportunities, and Advancing Environmental and Social Resilience. Law Econ 16(2): 88-102.
  21. Wahbeh S, Anastasiadis F, Sundarakani B, Manikas I (2022) Exploration of Food Security Challenges towards More Sustainable Food Production: A Systematic Literature Review of the Major Drivers and Policies. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) 11(23): 3804.
  22. Goodwin L (2023) The Global benefits of reducing food loss and waste and how to do it. World Resources Institute.
  23. World Bank (2024) Global Food and Nutrition Security Dashboard. Accessed on: April 02, 2025. Available online at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/food-security/brief/the-global-food-and-nutrition-security-dashboard
  24. Hasan HR, Musamih A, Salah K, Jayaraman R, Omar M, et al. (2024) Smart agriculture assurance: IoT and blockchain for trusted sustainable produce. Comput Electron Agric 224: 109184.
  25. Burgess PR, Sunmola FT, Wertheim-Heck S (2023) A review of supply chain quality management practices in sustainable food networks. Heliyon 9(11): e21179.
  26. Kesari A, Noel JY (2023) Nutritional Assessment. [Updated 2023 Apr 10]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580496/
  27. Bai Y, Alemu R, Block SA, Headey D, Masters WA (2021) Cost and affordability of nutritious diets at retail prices: Evidence from 177 countries. Food Policy 99: 101983.
  28. Doustmohammadian A, Nasrabadi MF, Mohammadi KN, Hajjar M, Alibeyk S, et al. (2022) Community-based participatory interventions to improve food security: A systematic review. Front Nutr 9: 1028394.
  29. Hiywotu AM (2025) Advancing sustainable agriculture for goal 2: Zero hunger - a comprehensive overview of practices, policies, and technologies. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst pp: 1-29.
  30. S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. (n.d.). Key statistics & graphics. Retrieved from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/key-statistics-graphics.aspx
  31. United Nations (2022) The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022. Accessed on: December 28, 2023. Available online at: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/The-Sustainabl-Development-Goals-Report-2022.pdf
  32. Sampson D, Cely-Santos M, Gemmill-Herren B, Babin N, Bernhart A, et al. (2021) Food Sovereignty and Rights-Based Approaches Strengthen Food Security and Nutrition Across the Globe: A Systematic Review. Front Sustain Food Syst 5: 686492.
  33. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO (2021) The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021: Transforming Food Systems for Food Security, Improved Nutrition and Affordable Healthy Diets for All. Rome: FAO.
  34. Global Hunger Index (2024) Accelerated Action Is Needed to Progress toward Zero Hunger (2024-2025). Accessed on: April 03, 2025. Available online at: https://www.globalhungerindex.org/
  35. Global Hunger Index (2021) Regional, and National Trends, Chapter 01. Accessed on: December 22, 2024. Available online at: https://www.globalhungerindex.org/pdf/en/2021.pdf
  36. Walker RJ, Garacci E, Dawson AZ, Williams JS, Ozieh M, et al. (2021) Trends in Food Insecurity in the United States from 2011-2017: Disparities by Age, Sex, Race/Ethnicity, and Income. Popul Health Manag 24(4): 496-501.
  37. Rabbitt MP, Reed-Jones M, Hales LJ, Burke MP (2024) Household food security in the United States in 2023 (Report No. ERR-337). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  38. Gostin LO, Monahan JT, Kaldor J, DeBartolo M, Friedman EA, et al. (2019) The legal determinants of health: Harnessing the power of law for global health and sustainable development. Lancet (London, England) 393(10183): 1857-1910.
  39. A FARM TO FORK STRATEGY: FOR A FAIR, HEALTHY ANDENVIRONMENTALLY-FRIENDLY FOOD SYSTEM (2020) Communication from the Commission to the European parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the regions, Brussels, 20.5.2020, COM (2020) 381final. Accessed on: November 09, 2020. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/farm2fork_en/
  40. FROM FARM TO FORK: HUMAN HEALTH AND WELL-BEING THROUGH SUSTAINABLE AGRI-FOOD SYSTEMS. Accessed on: April 30, 2025. Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349229399_FROM_FARM_TO_FORK_HUMAN_HEALTH_AND_WELL-BEING_THROUGH_SUSTAINABLE_AGRI-FOOD_SYSTEMS
  41. FARM TO FORK STRATEGY. Accessed on: April 30, 2025. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/f2f_action-plan_2020_strategy-info_en.pdf/
  42. EUROPEAN GREEN DEAL. Accessed on: April 29, 2025. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en/
  43. Press Release: Reinforcing Europe's resilience: halting biodiversity loss and building a healthy and sustainable food system. (2020). Reinforcing Europe's resilience: halting biodiversity loss and building a healthy and sustainable food system.
  44. INTEGRATED FOOD SAFETY POLICY IN THE EU. Accessed on: March 30, 2025. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/overview_en/
  45. KEY POLICY OBJECTIVES OF THE FUTURE CAP. Accessed on: March 30, 2025. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/key-policies/commonagricultural-policy/future-cap/key-policy-objectives-future-cap_en#nineobjectives/
  46. Wali N, Agho K, Renzaho AMN (2023) Mapping of nutrition policies and programs in South Asia towards achieving the Global Nutrition targets. Arch Public Health 81: 171.
  47. Pingali P, Abraham M (2022) Food Systems Transformation in Asia-A Brief Economic History. Agric Econ 53(6): 895-910.
  48. Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies (1998) Food security and political stability in the Asia-Pacific region. Available online at: https://dkiapcss.edu/Publications/Report_Food_Security_98.html
  49. Haque T (2006) Resource use efficiency in Indian agriculture. Indian J Agric Econ 61(1): 65-76.
  50. United Nations Human Settlements Programme and United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2019). Accessed on: April 30, 2025. Available online at: https://sdgs.un.org/un-system-sdg-implementation/economic-and-social-commission-asia-and-pacific-unescap-34586
  51. BadianeO, CollinsJ, UlimwenguJ (2020) The past, present, and future of agriculture policy in Africa. In Sustaining Africa's Agrifood System Transformation: The Role of Public Policies, ed. D Resnick, X Diao, G Tadesse pp: 9-25. Washington, DC:
  52. Anderson JR (2008) Agricultural advisory services. Backgr Pap. World Dev Rep Agric Rural Dev Dep. World Bank, NY. Available online at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/pt/490981468338348743/pdf/413540Anderson1AdvisoryServices01PUBLIC1.pdf
  53. Battersby J (2018) MDGs to SDGs–new goals, same gaps: the continued absence of urban food security in the post-2015 global development agenda. In Africa in the Post-2015 Development Agenda. pp: 115-129. Routledge.
  54. Working for household food security and economic prosperity in Africa. National Department of Agriculture (South Africa) on behalf of NEPAD Secretariat. [First NEPAD provisional agriculture strategy paper - presented at 22nd FAO Regional Conference for Africa, Cairo, February 3 - 8, 2002.
  55. Mutengwa CS, Mnkeni P, Kondwakwenda A (2023) Climate-Smart Agriculture and Food Security in Southern Africa: A Review of the Vulnerability of Smallholder Agriculture and Food Security to Climate Change. Sustainability 15(4): 2882.
  56. Bebbington A (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev 27(12): 2021-2044.
  57. Baptiste HJ, Cai YG, Atiquil Islam AYM, Wenceslas N (2022) A systematic review of university social responsibility in post-conflict societies: The case of the great lake region of East Africa. Soc Indic Res 164(1): 439-475.
  58. Breisinger C, Diao X, Thurlow J, Hassan RMA (2011) Potential impacts of a green revolution in Africa-the case of Ghana. J Int Dev 23(1): 82-102.
  59. Stein H (2011) World Bank agricultural policies, poverty and income inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 4(1): 79-90.
  60. Ministry of Women and Child Development India: Global Hunger Index 2021.
  61. Department of Food and Public Distribution, Government of India (2013) National Food Security Act, (NFSA). Accessed on: December 30, 2024. Available online at: https://nfsa.gov.in/portal/nfsa-act
  62. Athreya VB, Rukmani R, Bhavani RV, Anuradha G, Gopinath R, et al. (2010) Report on the State of Food Insecurity in Urban India, M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation. Available online at: https://www.wfp.org/sites/default/files/Report%20on%20Food%20Insecurity%20in%20Urban%20India.pdf
  63. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) (2006) Highlights of the Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006.
  64. Pander AK (2025) Food Security in India: Government Initiatives, Challenges and Potential Solutions. Indian J Soc Politics 12(1): 45-50.
  65. World Health Organization (WHO) (2024) Food Safety. Accessed on: March 30, 2025. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety
  66. Executive summary (2022) WHO global strategy for food safety 2022-2030: Towards stronger food safety systems and global cooperation. Accessed on: April 16, 2025. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240057685
  67. World Health Organization (2024) Inception meeting of the WHO alliance for Food Safety. Accessed on: April 15, 2025. Available online at: https://www.who.int/initiatives/who-alliance-for-food-safety/inception-meeting
  68. World Health Organization (2006) Five Keys to Safer Food Manual. Accessed on: April 18, 2025. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241594639

    No Files Found